Sunday, April 6, 2025

Multichoice Challenges Tribunal’s Ruling Over Accused Unfair Pricing Practices

Multichoice Nigeria, facing a recent judgment by the Competition and Consumer Protection Tribunal that levied a N150 millionMultichoice Nigeria, facing a recent judgment by the Competition and Consumer Protection Tribunal that levied a N150 million fine against them, is pushing back fine against them, is pushing back against what it describes as a violation of their right to a fair hearing. The tribunal’s decision also included an order for the pay-TV giant to offer a one-month free subscription to its DSTV and GOTV services, a response to a suit accusing the company of unfair pricing practices.

Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Moyosore.J. Onibanjo, representing Multichoice, expressed the company’s intent to appeal the ruling promptly, challenging the tribunal’s stance on their jurisdiction among other aspects of the case.

The controversy stems from a restraining order issued by the tribunal against Multichoice, aimed at halting subscription rate increases until a pending motion on notice, filed by Barrister Festus Onifade, could be resolved. Onifade’s lawsuit against Multichoice and the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) accused the service provider of instituting subscription fee hikes without adequate notice to consumers.

Despite Multichoice’s objections, which were premised on the argument that similar cases had previously been resolved in their favor, Onifade contended that the core issue was the adequacy of notice provided for the May 1, 2024, subscription increase, asserting that an 8-day notice fell short of legal requirements.

READ MORE: Tribunal Fines Multichoice N150 Million, Orders Free DStv, GOtv Sub for Nigerians

Justice Thomas Okosu, leading the three-member tribunal panel, cited Section 39(2) of the FCCPC Act to affirm the tribunal’s wide jurisdiction over commercial activities within Nigeria aimed at profit. He refuted claims that consumer rights issues necessitate involving the President of Nigeria or the Price Control Board, highlighting Onifade’s attempts to engage the FCCPC before legal action.

Declaring the tribunal’s authority to adjudicate on the matter and finding Multichoice’s 8-day notice insufficient and in violation of interim orders, Justice Okosu dismissed Multichoice’s preliminary objections. Consequently, the tribunal mandated a N150 million administrative penalty against Multichoice and ordered the provision of a month’s free subscription to its Nigerian subscribers, marking a significant ruling in consumer protection efforts within the country.

Hot this week

WAG Urges Women To Strategise For Greater Representation In Governance

Founder Women Aligned for Growth (WAG), Dr. Ifeyinwa Nwakwesi...

Stark Pages Initiative Launches Literary Students Program to Inspire Young Writers

The Stark Pages Creative and Literary Arts Initiative, a...

Ozoya Football Foundation Kicks Off a New Era with Charitable Initiative in Edo State

The Ozoya Football Foundation is making waves in Nigerian...

After Two Years of War, Sudan’s Military Secures Key Victory in Khartoum

Sudan’s military has recaptured the Republican Palace in the...

29 Internet Fraudsters Jailed in Benin as Nigeria Deepens Cybercrime Crackdown

Justice has caught up with 29 internet fraudsters in...

Fuel Prices Set to Rise in Nigeria as Dangote Refinery Halts Naira Sales

Nigerians could soon face higher fuel prices after the...

Related Articles

Popular Categories